Google
Main

Isolation
Secretory system
Endurance
Otter
Otter
Vydrino
Vydrovaya the shrew
Blowing of the sowings
Breaking in
Visiting editorial staff
The out-of-town session of the law court
Viability
Overflow
Caused potentials
Calling production
Calling instrument
Abortion
Switch is electrical
Vykopochnye the forest instruments
Fillet
Vyksa
Redemption operation
Hatching
Vylcha
Vylchanov
Freezing the plants
Extinction
Extortion in
Soaking the plants
Freezing
Vfp

Образование - счетчик, рейтинг, каталог - FLEXER


The out-of-town session of the law court

in THE USSR examination by the law court of criminal case for the place of the accomplishment of crime, stay, work or studies of the defendant or of that suffered; civil - on the place of residence, work or studies of the plaintiff or of responder. Purpose of conducting v. s. s. - drawing attention to community to this process, strengthening its educational action on the citizens, the creation of the atmosphere of intolerance to the disturbances of law, the prevention of the accomplishment of new offenses.

In v. s. s. it is examined in average ok. 25% of all criminal cases, which entered into the law courts with the accusatory conclusion, and ok. 7-9% of civil matters of claim production. The top, the law court OF THE USSR indicates to the subordinate vessels the need to more widely practice conducting v. s. s. taking into account of urgency and public significance of the matters, and also that educational and preventive action, which they can show the results of their examination in the visiting session (for example, post. Plenum the top, the vessels OF THE USSR from 19 sounding boards. 1959, of 14 May 1962, from 22 sounding boards. 1964, from 25 Feb.. 1967). With resolution of a question about conducting of out-of-town session the law court takes into consideration not only the nature of act, the prevalence of the crimes of this form, but also motives and situation of its accomplishment, the personality of law-breaker and the presence in the matter of the circumstances, which require wide public censure. Initiative in the posing of the question about the conducting v. s. s. can belong not only to law court himself, but also to attorney; on the same can solicit public organizations for the place of residence, work or studies of the defendant either of that suffered (in the criminal cases), plaintiff or responder (according to the civil). Decision of conducting v. s. s. is formulated in the decision of judge or the determination of law court about legend cudu (in the criminal cases), about the designation of the matter to the judicial trial (in the civil matters). T. n. dobrovol'skaya.

Hosted by uCoz